skip to content

Partition Relation Equiconsistent with $\exists \kappa(o(\kappa) = \kappa^+)$

Presented by: 
YM Kimchi Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
Wednesday 26th August 2015 - 14:00 to 14:30
INI Seminar Room 2
Preamble: In this work we deal with partition relations with infinite exponents under $ZFC$, hence all results are limited to definable functions.

In [78], M. Spector has proven, basically, that $\exists \kappa(o(\kappa) = 1)$ is equiconsistent with $\aleph_1 \rightarrow (\omega)^{\omega}_{\aleph_0}$. In [87], we were able to show that the result generalizes to $n = 2$; namely, $\exists \kappa(o(\kappa) = 2)$ is equiconsistent with $\aleph_1 \rightarrow (\omega^2)^{\omega^2}_{\aleph_0}$. Surprisingly at first sight, this property cannot be generalized further (for $n> 2$), and later on we were able to prove that $\aleph_1 \rightarrow (\omega^3)^{\omega^3}_{\aleph_0}$ is equiconsistent with $\exists \kappa(o(o(\kappa)) = 2)$.

The above lead us to a finer notion of homogeneity:

Definition: Weak Homogeneity is the partition property $\kappa \xrightarrow{\text{\tiny WH}}(\lambda)^{\eta}_{\mu}$ where the only considered subsequences of $\lambda$ are those that are created by removing (or, complementarily, collecting) only finitely many segments of $\lambda$.

Using week homogeneity we were able to prove the following for any ordinal $\alpha$ [87]: $\exists \kappa(o(\kappa) = \alpha)$ is equiconsistent with $\aleph_1 \xrightarrow{\text{\tiny WH}}(\omega^\alpha)^{\omega^\alpha}_{\aleph_0}$.

Later on we were able to characterize the consistency strength of $\exists \kappa(o(\kappa)~=~\kappa)$, and recently we have arrived at the main result of this paper:

$\exists \kappa(o(\kappa) = \kappa^+)$ is equiconsistent with $\aleph_1 \xrightarrow{\text{\tiny WH}}(\aleph_1)^{\aleph_1}_{\aleph_0}$


[78] M. Spector: Natural Sentences of Mathematics which are independent of $V = L$, $V = L^\mu$ etc., 1978 (preprint).

[87] Y.M. Kimchi: Dissertation, 1987, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
The video for this talk should appear here if JavaScript is enabled.
If it doesn't, something may have gone wrong with our embedded player.
We'll get it fixed as soon as possible.
University of Cambridge Research Councils UK
    Clay Mathematics Institute London Mathematical Society NM Rothschild and Sons