skip to content

Vanishing lemmas and transcendence

Presented by: 
D Bertrand [Paris 6]
Wednesday 23rd February 2005 -
14:30 to 15:30
INI Seminar Room 1

Most transcendence proofs rely on a collection of statements of a purely geometric nature: the ``zero estimates" (or ``vanishing lemmas"), which ensure injectivity (or surjectivity) of an evaluation map on sections of a vector bundle at zero-dimensional subschemes of the base. We shall present (and time permitting, prove) them in a unified way, covering two of the main areas of transcendence: periods of one-motives (Baker-Wustholz theory), and values of solutions of differential equations (Siegel-Shidlovsky theorem).

A new proof of the latter theorem will also be discussed, as well as a $q$-difference analogue of the corresponding ``vanishing lemma".

In each case, the vanishing lemmas exhibit a geometric obstruction which is the key not only to the trancendence results themselves, but also to their conjectural generalizations (Schanuel, Grothendieck, Andr\'e).


D. Bertrand: Le th\'eor\`eme de Siegel-Shidlovsky revisit\'e, Pr\'epublication de l'Institut de Math\'ematiques de Jussieu, No 390, Mai 2004.

University of Cambridge Research Councils UK
    Clay Mathematics Institute The Leverhulme Trust London Mathematical Society Microsoft Research NM Rothschild and Sons